corporatebonds market value; samsung mini split reviews; abusive mother prestige deciblocker; jackie schmillen commercial property for sale sussex nj vcf to vcard. tadalafil mechanism of action google l4 signing bonus; raspberry pi pico game controller AppleA12 Bionic Chip vs Snapdragon 855+ 🔥 | Battle of Beasts? 🤔🤔| Apple A12 vs Snapdragon 855+ 🔥Hello Guys,Welcome to Pro Tech Village.About this video: Egalwie viel wir versuchen, wir können nicht anders, als den Snapdragon 855-Chipsatz mit dem Apple A12 Bionic in den iPhones zu vergleichen. Der etwas ältere A12 Bionic-Prozessor unterstützt die meisten iPhones von 2018, einschließlich des iPhone XR und des iPhone XS. CảA13 Bionic và Snapdragon 855+ đều dựa trên cấu trúc vi mô 64-bit và được sản xuất bằng quy trình chế tạo 7nm thế hệ thứ 2. Theo Apple công bố thì A13 Bionic có 8,5 tỷ bán dẫn (transistors). Tương tự trên A12 Bionic, toàn bộ GFLOPSindica cuántos mil millones de operaciones de punto flotante puede realizar el iGPU por segundo. Apple A12 Bionic. Apple A12 @ 1,13 GHz. 576 (64%) Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. Qualcomm Adreno 640 @ 0,59 GHz. 899 (100%) Vay Tiền Nhanh Chỉ Cần Cmnd Nợ Xấu. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Apple A12 BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 855 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2018. The SoC integrates a fast Prime Core’ that clocks up to GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of GHz. The higher Prime Core’ clock speed should provide significantly better single core performance than the Snapdragon 845, but we suspect that the Snapdragon 855 will fall short of the Apple A12 Bionic. The new SoC should have up to 45% faster single-core performance and 35% multi-core performance than its predecessor. Qualcomm praises the Snapdragon 855’s ability to maintain its performance when faced with sustained load, beating the Apple A12 Bionic SoC and the HiSilicon Kirin 980. The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too. Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds. The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit NPU with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC. The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine CV-ISP that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption. The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM 4 x 16-bit. Moreover, the Adreno 640 has 50% more compute units ALUs than the Adreno 630, while Qualcomm claims that it should be 20% faster than its predecessor. We currently do not know what clock speeds the Adreno 640 will operate at as Qualcomm did not announce these during the announcement of the Snapdragon 855. Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855 at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC using a 7 nm FinFET process. The switch to 7 nm manufacturing should make the SD855 20% more efficient than the SD845. Qualcomm has not officially announced the thermal design power TDP of the SD855, but we suspect that the SoC will reach a maximum of 5 W and will average around W under load. Apple A12 Bionic ► remove from comparisonThe Apple A12 Bionic is a System on a Chip SoC from Apple that is found in the iPhone Xs and Xr. It was announced late 2018 and offers 6 cores divided in 2 performance cores and four power efficiency cores. Compared to the previous A11 Bionic, the A12 should offer a 15% improved CPU performance for the performance cores and a 50% lower power consumption for the efficiency cores both according to Apple. The chip also includes a new GPU that is advertised as 50% faster, the M12 Motion co-processor and a Neural Engine with 8 cores for up to 5 trillion operations per second. With billion transistors, the A12 Bionic is a big chip especially compared to the Snapdragon 835 3 Billion or a Skylake desktop quad-core Soc Billion. Compared to the A11, the A12 integrates 60% more Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 20636 avg 32923 median 31198 26% max 45072 Points min 27400 avg 27548 median 27547 23% max 27717 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1934 avg 3937 median 4112 52% max 5024 Points min 2723 avg 3064 median 3056 38% max 3347 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2345 avg 3892 median 58% max 4703 Points min 2880 avg 3129 median 2961 42% max 3493 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 552 avg 713 median 744 32% max 751 Points min 1116 avg 1118 median 48% max 1119 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2164 avg 2622 median 2694 9% max 2856 Points min 2772 avg 2815 median 10% max 2857 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 725 avg 742 median 742 3% max 750 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2441 avg 2616 median 8% max 2852 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3406 avg 3480 median 3491 36% max 3537 Points min 4750 avg 4779 median 4774 49% max 4824 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 10187 avg 10955 median 12% max 11388 Points min 11244 avg 11418 median 11480 13% max 11598 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3295 avg 3548 median 3548 51% max 3801 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 10163 avg 10529 median 10529 26% max 10895 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 1658 avg 1926 median 1926 16% max 2194 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 3919 avg 4247 median 4247 39% max 4575 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11986 avg 14903 median 29% max 17819 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5470 avg 6620 median 13% max 7769 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 7059 avg 8575 median 22% max 10090 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 1852 avg 2147 median 2114 2% max 2611 ms min 603 avg 627 median 1% max 653 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score *Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 17011 avg 23240 median 23937 23% max 25640 Points min 41367 avg 42312 median 40% max 43280 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 90 avg median 25% max 129 Points min 155 avg median 37% max 166 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 239512 avg 255436 median 255924 87% max 268271 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 9188 avg 13484 median 13816 42% max 19329 Points min 7312 avg 9998 median 31% max 12409 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 53266 avg 73247 median 74726 92% max 79058 Points min 59570 avg 65177 median 66701 82% max 67735 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 67537 avg 152512 median 156467 49% max 191221 Points min 129473 avg 147840 median 151931 47% max 158023 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 85969 avg 115207 median 118475 73% max 127208 Points min 106600 avg 124761 median 127986 78% max 136472 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 217967 avg 354450 median 368232 65% max 398720 Points min 302955 avg 347775 median 358800 63% max 370545 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UXmin 51228 avg 63930 median 64229 54% max 72343 Points min 71574 avg 71607 median 60% max 71639 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMmin 52596 avg 61638 median 59373 48% max 75544 Points min 45962 avg 56767 median 56767 46% max 67572 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUmin 158097 avg 167704 median 167146 31% max 175532 Points min 166588 avg 170290 median 170290 31% max 173992 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUmin 114777 avg 135173 median 139365 50% max 140166 Points min 98561 avg 122385 median 122385 44% max 146209 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Scoremin 376698 avg 428445 median 432658 42% max 451559 Points min 411764 avg 421049 median 421048 41% max 430333 Points Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total ScoreAntutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPUPassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 197214 avg 236383 median 246456 32% max 265478 Points min 482773 avg 486852 median 486197 64% max 491585 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 5121 avg 6872 median 33% max 12391 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 5578 avg 11793 median 11067 24% max 18491 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 8342 avg 9710 median 9664 63% max 11440 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 10330 avg 12161 median 11890 59% max 14439 Points Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 → 100% n=23Average Benchmarks Apple A12 Bionic → 112% n=23 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 13. 1445400 checking url part for id 11011 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 10166 +0s ... 0s 2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 4 composed specs + ... 5 did output specs +0s ... 6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11011 + ... 7 got single benchmarks 11011 + ... 8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10166 + ... 9 got single benchmarks 10166 + ... 10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 13 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 14 return log + ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11 Qualcomm’s latest flagship mobile processor is the first 5G ready mobile chipset. Apart from that, the Snapdragon 855 carries new Kryo CPU cores, a power efficient 7nm fabrication process, and an upgraded X24 LTE modem. We don’t have to wait for long since the new Samsung Galaxy S10 is one of the flagships to house matter how much we try, we can’t help but compare the Snapdragon 855 chipset with Apple A12 Bionic in the iPhones. The slightly older A12 Bionic processor powers most of the 2018 iPhones, including the iPhone XR and the iPhone XS. The A12 Bionic is one of the first mobile processors to be manufactured using the 7nm fabrication process. It delivers a faster graphics performance and an enhanced Neural we’re comparing these two top-tier processors of 2019 at least for now to chart out their similarities as well as dive into the That MatterPropertyApple A12 BionicSnapdragon 855PropertyApple A12 BionicSnapdragon 855Design Process7nm7nmArchitecture64-bit64-bitCPU6-core processor 2x Performance cores + 4x Efficiency cores8 x Kryo 485 CPUs clocked up to GHzGPUApple-designed 4-core GPUAdreno 640CameraApple’s ISPDual 14-bit CV-ISPs, Spectra 380 ISPChargingWireless charging, Normal Charging via USBQualcomm Quick Charge 4+Performance ImprovementsThe A12 Bionic and the Snapdragon 855 processors are based on the 64-bit microarchitecture and manufactured through the 7nm fabrication process. A smaller process node boosts the overall performance and the power efficiency of the chipset. Well, that’s the only similarity between both the A12 Bionic adopts a six-core CPU configuration — two Performance cores and four Efficiency A12 Bionic only brings a relative bump in performance and not too significant one when compared to the A11 Bionic. So you’ll notice that the app launches are a bit faster owing to the smart compute system. Also, A12 Bionic is more power efficient and consumes less the 6-core CPU implementation of the A12, the Snapdragon 855 has 8-core configuration. Qualcomm has opted for a tri-cluster arrangement, instead of the regular two cluster Snapdragon 855 sports eight Kryo 845 cores clustered across a single Prime’ Cortex A76 core clocked at GHz, three Performance’ Cortex-A76 cores clocked at GHz and lastly four Efficiency’ Cortex-A55 cores clocked at GHz. These clusters are designed for high performance, high efficiency, improved task-sharing capacities and low latency addition to that, the Snapdragon 855’s Prime core has a 512KB L2 cache and is coupled with performance core’s 256KB L2 caches and the efficiency core’s 128KB L2 cache. These L2 Caches work together to push the information way quickly and without any interruptions by acting as a bridge between the processor and the the GPU front, the Snapdragon 855 bundles the Adreno 640 GPU which offers a 20 percent boost in gaming graphics and can handle 4K HDR10+ playback. That’s what Qualcomm TestsWell, the benchmark scores may not accurately translate to the real world experience. But at the end of the day, these scores help portray the potential of a chip in numbers. Hence, a peek into the benchmark scores helps gauge the true prowess of a A12 Bionic-Powered iPhone XRAs per the folks at Tom’s Guide, the Snapdragon 855 scored 3,552 single-core points and 11,196 multi-core points on Geekbench 4 benchmark tests. On the other hand, the Apple iPhone XS powered by the A12 Bionic clocked 4,701 single-core and 11,420 multi-core in multi-core on the same benchmark difference is quite slim in multi-core tests but is significant differences in single-core BionicSnapdragon 855PropertyA12 BionicSnapdragon 855Single-core Geekbench 4 Score4,7013,552Multi-core Geekbench 4 Score11,42011,196Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence or AI plays an integral part in the chipsets of 2018-19. When it comes to the Snapdragon 855, it bundles a 4th generation multi-core AI Engine to power the AI-related tasks. It’s worth noting that this engine is a combination of the Hexagon 690 processor, the Kyro CPU, and the Adreno GPU. If we talk numbers, it’s capable of handling up to 7 trillion AI operations per Snapdragon 855’s Hexagon 690 DSP is upgraded to handle more complex AI tasks. And combined with a dedicated tensor accelerator, the DSP gives the chipset a threefold gain in machine learning the many advantages of this AI engine, a few notable ones include scene detection, super resolutions in snapshots, face authentication, dual and single-camera bokeh, and text new chipset also supports AI frameworks like Google’s TensorFlow, Facebook’s Caffe 2, and the Open Neural Network Exchange ONNX.As opposed to Qualcomm’s 4-core AI engine, Apple bundles an 8-core Neural Engine in its A12 Bionic processor. And it can perform a whopping 5 trillion AI operations per from tasks like face detection or making predictions based on your actions, the key task of this processor is resource allocation which we mentioned above. It smartly computes where to run algorithms on the GPU, the processor or in the neural engine. At the same time, it can even direct additional processing power where there are improvements like faster app launches, learning user habits, and real-time machine learning power. Apple claims that it can run Core ML nine times faster, while at the same time using only a small portion of the resources and battery Shutter GameToday, camera tech and AI walk hand-in-hand. That’s because cameras are now tapping into the power of the AI engine for producing images which are rich in details and are crisp as well as shot captured through the iPhone XRIn the case of the A12 Bionic processor, the neural engine helps to analyze shots in real-time and makes the changes accordingly. Plus, the enhanced ISP brings home minute details to photos. Along with that, the Smart HDR brings in quality dynamic the other hand, the Snapdragon 855 features the in-house Spectra 380 Image Signal Processor. Qualcomm claims that it is the world’s first AI-integrated Snapdragon 855-powered Galaxy S10 PlusThis gives the chip a gain when it comes to hardware depth sensing, object segmentation and object classification in real-time. For instance, your phone will be able to easily replace video or photo backgrounds in real time, among other Battle Cry Gets LouderApart from the key differences above, the Snapdragon 855’s main advantage is that it is 5G ready and one of the most noticeable upgrades will be the bump in speed. It also features the Snapdragon X24 LTE that can enable download speed up to 2Gbps and upload speed up to 316 Mbps. Plus, it also features the new Elite gaming mode to improve the overall gaming it comes to the performance, both are almost at par, with the A12 Bionic taking the lead in single core performance. But when it comes to being a future-ready chipset, the 855 fights hard for the top spot. Hopefully, the next generation Apple chipsets will challenge the Snapdragon 855 and bridge the up Intrigued by the new Samsung Exynos 9820 processor in the Galaxy S10 and S10 Plus? Read about the chipset’s features in detail from the link below. Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Apple A12 Bionic ► remove from comparisonThe Apple A12 Bionic is a System on a Chip SoC from Apple that is found in the iPhone Xs and Xr. It was announced late 2018 and offers 6 cores divided in 2 performance cores and four power efficiency cores. Compared to the previous A11 Bionic, the A12 should offer a 15% improved CPU performance for the performance cores and a 50% lower power consumption for the efficiency cores both according to Apple. The chip also includes a new GPU that is advertised as 50% faster, the M12 Motion co-processor and a Neural Engine with 8 cores for up to 5 trillion operations per second. With billion transistors, the A12 Bionic is a big chip especially compared to the Snapdragon 835 3 Billion or a Skylake desktop quad-core Soc Billion. Compared to the A11, the A12 integrates 60% more Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus 855+ Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in 2019. Compared to the normal Snapdragon 855, the 855 Plus offers higher clock speeds of the GPU and CPU. The SoC integrates a fast Prime Core’ that clocks up to GHz up from GHz in the 855 and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of GHz. The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too. Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds. The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit NPU with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC. The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine CV-ISP that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption. The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM 4 x 16-bit. As the SD855, the 855+ integrates an Adreno 640 graphics card that is now higher clocked and should offer a 15% higher performance. Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855+ at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC using a 7 nm FinFET process. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2018. The SoC integrates a fast Prime Core’ that clocks up to GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of GHz. The higher Prime Core’ clock speed should provide significantly better single core performance than the Snapdragon 845, but we suspect that the Snapdragon 855 will fall short of the Apple A12 Bionic. The new SoC should have up to 45% faster single-core performance and 35% multi-core performance than its predecessor. Qualcomm praises the Snapdragon 855’s ability to maintain its performance when faced with sustained load, beating the Apple A12 Bionic SoC and the HiSilicon Kirin 980. The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too. Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds. The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit NPU with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC. The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine CV-ISP that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption. The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM 4 x 16-bit. Moreover, the Adreno 640 has 50% more compute units ALUs than the Adreno 630, while Qualcomm claims that it should be 20% faster than its predecessor. We currently do not know what clock speeds the Adreno 640 will operate at as Qualcomm did not announce these during the announcement of the Snapdragon 855. Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855 at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC using a 7 nm FinFET process. The switch to 7 nm manufacturing should make the SD855 20% more efficient than the SD845. Qualcomm has not officially announced the thermal design power TDP of the SD855, but we suspect that the SoC will reach a maximum of 5 W and will average around W under load. BenchmarksPerformance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855+ ...Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus...Performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 27400 avg 27548 median 27547 23% max 27717 Points min 30069 avg 34737 median 32129 27% max 42240 Points min 20636 avg 32923 median 31198 26% max 45072 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2723 avg 3064 median 3056 38% max 3347 Points min 3137 avg 4371 median 4659 58% max 4737 Points min 1934 avg 3937 median 4112 52% max 5024 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2880 avg 3129 median 2961 42% max 3493 Points min 3143 avg 4323 median 65% max 4725 Points min 2345 avg 3892 median 58% max 4703 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1116 avg 1118 median 48% max 1119 Points min 738 avg 751 median 751 32% max 764 Points min 552 avg 713 median 744 32% max 751 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2772 avg 2815 median 10% max 2857 Points min 2652 avg 2659 median 9% max 2665 Points min 2164 avg 2622 median 2694 9% max 2856 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 761 avg 782 median 3% max 792 Points min 725 avg 742 median 742 3% max 750 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2519 avg 2788 median 9% max 2940 Points min 2441 avg 2616 median 8% max 2852 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 4750 avg 4779 median 4774 49% max 4824 Points min 3603 avg 3654 median 3654 38% max 3705 Points min 3406 avg 3480 median 3491 36% max 3537 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 11244 avg 11418 median 11480 13% max 11598 Points min 9705 avg 10547 median 12% max 11388 Points min 10187 avg 10955 median 12% max 11388 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3295 avg 3548 median 3548 51% max 3801 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 10163 avg 10529 median 10529 26% max 10895 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 1658 avg 1926 median 1926 16% max 2194 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 3919 avg 4247 median 4247 39% max 4575 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11986 avg 14903 median 29% max 17819 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5470 avg 6620 median 13% max 7769 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 7059 avg 8575 median 22% max 10090 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 603 avg 627 median 1% max 653 ms min 2007 avg 2054 median 2032 2% max 2134 ms min 1852 avg 2147 median 2114 2% max 2611 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score *Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 41367 avg 42312 median 40% max 43280 Points min 23781 avg 24606 median 24571 23% max 25353 Points min 17011 avg 23240 median 23937 23% max 25640 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 155 avg median 37% max 166 Points min 89 avg median 98 23% max 111 Points min 90 avg median 25% max 129 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 239512 avg 255436 median 255924 87% max 268271 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 7312 avg 9998 median 31% max 12409 Points min 9188 avg 13484 median 13816 42% max 19329 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 59570 avg 65177 median 66701 82% max 67735 Points min 53266 avg 73247 median 74726 92% max 79058 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 129473 avg 147840 median 151931 47% max 158023 Points min 67537 avg 152512 median 156467 49% max 191221 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 106600 avg 124761 median 127986 78% max 136472 Points min 85969 avg 115207 median 118475 73% max 127208 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 302955 avg 347775 median 358800 63% max 370545 Points min 217967 avg 354450 median 368232 65% max 398720 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UXmin 71574 avg 71607 median 60% max 71639 Points min 66276 avg 72044 median 71855 60% max 78191 Points min 51228 avg 63930 median 64229 54% max 72343 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMmin 45962 avg 56767 median 56767 46% max 67572 Points min 64026 avg 80567 median 67% max 92659 Points min 52596 avg 61638 median 59373 48% max 75544 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUmin 166588 avg 170290 median 170290 31% max 173992 Points min 169591 avg 184179 median 184036 34% max 199051 Points min 158097 avg 167704 median 167146 31% max 175532 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUmin 98561 avg 122385 median 122385 44% max 146209 Points min 132673 avg 139174 median 139170 50% max 145684 Points min 114777 avg 135173 median 139365 50% max 140166 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Scoremin 411764 avg 421049 median 421048 41% max 430333 Points min 462125 avg 478464 median 474972 46% max 501784 Points min 376698 avg 428445 median 432658 42% max 451559 Points Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total ScoreAntutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPUPassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 482773 avg 486852 median 486197 64% max 491585 Points min 237506 avg 249793 median 249792 33% max 262079 Points min 197214 avg 236383 median 246456 32% max 265478 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 6325 avg 7543 median 7424 39% max 8880 Points min 5121 avg 6872 median 33% max 12391 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 13484 avg 15895 median 34% max 18305 Points min 5578 avg 11793 median 11067 24% max 18491 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 8702 avg 10315 median 68% max 11690 Points min 8342 avg 9710 median 9664 63% max 11440 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 10286 avg 13201 median 12786 64% max 15510 Points min 10330 avg 12161 median 11890 59% max 14439 Points Average Benchmarks Apple A12 Bionic → 100% n=23Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus → 102% n=23Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 → 96% n=23 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 13. 1445420 checking url part for id 10166 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 11491 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 11011 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10166 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 10166 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11491 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 11491 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11011 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 11011 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 16 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 17 return log +0s ... Apple A12 BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 855Mengapa Apple A12 Bionic lebih baik daripada Qualcomm Snapdragon 855?Bandwidth memori lebih banyak? Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 lebih baik daripada Apple A12 Bionic?CPU speed lebih cepat?1 x & 3 x & 4 x x & 4 x threads 2 buah lebih banyak?8vs6Mendownload 2x lebih cepat?2000MBits/svs1000MBits/sMenggunakan HMP?Memiliki dukungan 5G?Mengupload lebih cepat?318MBits/svs150MBits/sUlasan penggunaPeringkat keseluruhanApple A12 Bionic8 Ulasan penggunaApple A12 BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 8558 Ulasan penggunaQualcomm Snapdragon 855FiturInfo UmumSistem operasi 32-bit hanya dapat mendukung RAM sampai 4GB. Sedangkan 64-bit bisa lebih dari 4GB, otomatis performanya lebih baik. Sistem 64-bit juga bisa menjalankan aplikasi kartu grafis yang disematkan, kamu tidak perlu membeli kartu grafis kecil memberikan kinerja yang lebih baik dan konsumsi daya yang lebih rendah. Chipset dengan jumlah transistor yang lebih banyak, komponen semikonduktor perangkat elektronik menawarkan lebih banyak daya komputasi. Faktor bentuk kecil memungkinkan lebih banyak transistor untuk dipasang pada sebuah chip, oleh karena itu meningkatkan Processing Unit GPU memiliki kecepatan clock yang lebih DirectX Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 BionicDirectX digunakan untuk permainan, dengan versi terbaru mendukung grafik yang lebih wireless generasi kelima memberikan kecepatan yang lebih tinggi dan latensi yang lebih rendah daripada teknologi generasi keempat GPU Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 BionicKetika GPU berjalan di bawah ambang batasnya, dapat dipacu ke clock speed yang lebih tinggi untuk meningkatkan OpenGL ES Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 BionicOpenGL ES digunakan untuk permainan di perangkat mobile seperti smartphones. Versi terbaru untuk grafik yang lebih baikversi OpenCL Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 BionicBeberapa aplikasi menggunakan OpenCL untuk mengatur Graphics Processing Unit GPU untuk komputasi non-graphical. Versi terbaru memperkenalkan banyak fungsi dan performa lebih CPU menunjukkan berapa banyak siklus pemrosesan per detik yang dapat dijalankan oleh CPU, dengan mempertimbangkan semua intinya unit pemrosesan. Ini dihitung dengan menambahkan clock rate masing-masing inti atau, dalam hal prosesor multi-inti yang menggunakan berbagai arsitektur mikro, masing-masing kelompok banyak hasil thread dalam performa yang lebih cepat dan multitasking yang lebih teknologi sebuah chip dapat beralih di antara dua set inti prosesor untuk memaksimalkan kinerja dan daya tahan baterai. Misalnya, saat bermain game, inti yang lebih kuat akan digunakan untuk meningkatkan kinerja, sedangkan memeriksa email akan menggunakan inti yang kurang kuat untuk memaksimalkan daya tahan Multi-Processing HMP adalah versi yang lebih canggih dari teknologi Dalam pengaturan ini, prosesor dapat menggunakan semua inti pada saat yang sama, atau hanya satu inti untuk tugas dengan intensitas rendah. Sehingga dapat memberikan kinerja yang kuat atau meningkatkan daya tahan CPU berjalan di bawah ambang batasnya, dapat dipacu ke clock speed yang lebih tinggi untuk meningkatkan L2 Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855L2 cache lebih besar di CPU yang lebih cepat dan L1 Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855L1 cache lebih besar di CPU yang lebih cepat dan clock Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Clock multiplier mengatur kecepatan CPUcache L3 Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855L3 cache lebih besar di CPU yang lebih cepat dan memori yang lebih cepat, yang menghasilkan performa sistem lebih DDR Double Data Rate adalah jenis RAM paling umum. Versi DDR yang lebih baru mendukung kecepatan maksimum yang lebih tinggi dan lebih hemat memori maksimum RAM yang adalah tingkat maksimum yang data dapat dibaca dari atau disimpan ke dalam memori Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 BionicLebih banyak kanal memori meningkatkan kecepatan perpindahan data antara memori dan CPUversi eMMC Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Versi eMMC yang lebih tinggi memungkinkan antarmuka memori yang lebih cepat, berdampak positif pada kinerja perangkat. Misalnya, saat mentransfer file dari komputer ke penyimpanan internal melalui kode perbaikan kesalahan dapat mendeteksi kerusakan data. Ini digunakan ketika sangat penting menghidari kerusakan, seperti scientific computing atau ketika menjalankan pada sebuah chip SoC memiliki chip seluler LTE terintegrasi. LTE mampu men-download dengan kecepatan lebih cepat dari yang sebelumnya yaitu, teknologi unduh adalah ukuran bandwith koneksi internet, menunjukkan tingkat pengiriman data maksimum yang digunakan suatu perangkat untuk mengakses konten unggah adalah ukuran bandwidth koneksi internet, menunjukkan tingkat pengiriman data maksimum di mana sebuah perangkat dapat mengirim informasi ke server atau perangkat teknologi yang diintegrasikan kepada processor untuk mengamankan perangkat untuk digunakan dengan fitur-fitur seperti pembayaran telepon, dan video streaming menggunakan digital rights management DRMTeknologi multithreading seperti Hyperthreading dari Intel atau Simultanous Multithreading dari AMD memberikan peningkatan kinerja dengan memisahkan tiap-tiap inti fisik prosesor menjadi inti virtual, yang juga dikenal sebagai thread. Dengan cara ini, setiap inti dapat menjalankan dua aliran instruksi bit membantu melindungi komputer dari serangan yang dilakukan dalam satu waktu Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855NEON menyediakan akeslerasi untuk memproses media, seperti mendengarkan MP3AES digunakan untuj mempercepat enkripsi dan VFP Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Vector Floating-Point VFP digunakan oleh processor untuk memberikan peningkatan kinerja di area seperti gambar 5 adalah perbandingan lintas platform yang mengukur kinerja inti tunggal prosesor Sumber Primate Labs, 2023Geekbench 5 adalah perbandingan lintas platform yang mengukur kinerja inti banyak dari sebuah prosesor Sumber Primate Labs, 2023hasil PassMark Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Penghitungan ini mengukur kinerja CPU menggunakan multiple threadPenghitungan ini mengukur performa CPU menggunakan single threadhasil PassMark overclocked Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 Bionic Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855Penghitungan ini mengukur performa CPU ketika di Bluetooth Tidak diketahui. Bantu kami dengan menyarankan nilai. Apple A12 BionicBluetooth adalah standar teknologi wireless yang memungkinkan transfer data antar perangkat yang ditempatkan dalam jarak dekat, menggunakan gelombang radio frekuensi ultra-tinggi dengan panjang gelombang pendek. Versi yang lebih baru menyediakan transfer data yang lebih Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9200 PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Plus Gen 3Tunjukkan semuaThis page is currently only available in English.

a12 bionic vs snapdragon 855